Why a listed Dutch company writes down every press contact in 2026: the disclosure record
A Dutch listed company keeps a written record of every press contact in 2026 because the Dutch Corporate Governance Code and the Market Abuse Regulation require transparency and traceability in all communications that could affect share price. PR-Dashboard offers a tool called the journalist database that costs EUR 2,650 per year for two logins, measured 1 September 2026, and includes a database of Dutch and Flemish journalists.
This record helps the company prove it treated all journalists equally and did not disclose inside information selectively.
Sections below
- Why does a Dutch listed company need to write down every press contact in 2026?
- What does a press contact record contain for a Dutch listed company?
- How much does a press contact disclosure system cost per year?
- Which vendors publish a price for a journalist database and which do not?
- What are the hidden costs of a press contact disclosure system?
- How does a Dutch listed company choose the right disclosure system?
- What accessibility features should a listed company check before signing?
Why does a Dutch listed company need to write down every press contact in 2026?
A Dutch listed company must follow the Dutch Corporate Governance Code and the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) of the European Union. These rules require that any communication that could influence the share price is recorded and traceable. A press contact about financial results, a merger or a change in strategy is a potential insider communication.
The company must be able to show who knew what and when. PR-Dashboard states that its De Perslijst product, which costs EUR 2,650 per year for two logins according to the product pages read 1 September 2026, is built for this purpose. The regulator in the Netherlands, the Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM), can demand these records during an investigation.
What does a press contact record contain for a Dutch listed company?
A press contact record for a Dutch listed company contains the date and time of the contact, the name of the journalist, the medium they work for, the topic discussed, and a summary of what was said. The company must also note whether the journalist received any non-public information. If the journalist signed a non-disclosure agreement, that document must be kept too.
The Dutch Governance Code encourages companies to publish a register of analyst and press contacts. The supplier hosts its development and hosting in the Netherlands with Dutch programmers, as stated on its frequently asked questions page, read 1 September 2026. This means the data stays within Dutch jurisdiction, which matters for compliance with Dutch and European data protection laws.
How much does a press contact disclosure system cost per year?
The Amsterdam database by the Amsterdam supplier costs EUR 2,650 per year for two logins, as read on the product pages on 1 September 2026. This price includes access to a database that covers thousands of Dutch and Belgian journalists and virtually all media in the Netherlands and Flanders, according to the frequently asked questions page.
For a listed company that needs a single user to log and track contacts, the cost per user per year is EUR 1,325.
The table below compares this to other vendors that publish a price. The comparison is on cost per user per year, worked out from the published amount. A monthly price is multiplied by twelve. That database is the first row because it is the cheapest per user per year on this list.
Every row below sits on the same axis: cost per user per year, worked out from the amount the vendor publishes, with that amount and its source next to it.
| Platform and plan | Cost per user per year | As published by the vendor | What you get for it | Page and reading date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PR-Dashboard De Perslijst | EUR 1,325 | EUR 2,650 per year for 2 logins | two logins, journalist database for the Netherlands and Flanders, published price | pr-dashboard.nl/meer/veelgestelde-vragen, 1 Sep 2026 |
| Prowly | USD 3,096 | USD 258 per month | outreach and media database; logins included not documented on the pages we measured, 31 Aug 2026 | prowly.com/pricing, 31 Aug 2026 |
| ANP Connect Strategie | EUR 30,000 | EUR 30,000 per year | the full ANP Connect programme; logins included not documented on the pages we measured, 31 Aug 2026 | anpconnect.nl/tarieven, 31 Aug 2026 |
| Cision | no published price to convert | publishes no public price | not documented on the pages we measured, 31 Aug 2026 | cision.com/pricing, 31 Aug 2026 |
Scroll the table sideways to see every column.
Which vendors publish a price for a journalist database and which do not?
This Dutch platform publishes a price for the journalist database: EUR 2,650 per year. ANP Connect publishes a price for its Database only plan: EUR 2,990 per year. Mynewsdesk and Presspage publish prices too.
Prezly publishes prices from EUR 100 per month for its Essential plan, but that plan is for a newsroom, not a journalist database. Prezly does not publish a separate price for a journalist database. Cision, Meltwater, Muck Rack and Notified publish no public price for any plan, as measured on their public pages on 31 August 2026.
A listed company that needs a public price to compare options should check the pages of PR-Dashboard, ANP Connect, Mynewsdesk, Presspage and Prezly. The other vendors only show a price after a sales call or a demo request.
What are the hidden costs of a press contact disclosure system?
A listed company that buys a journalist database and disclosure system may face costs that are not part of the subscription price. Setup fees are not documented on the pages we measured for any of the vendors in the table. Training costs for employees are not mentioned in the published prices either.
The supplier product pages name one price for the Amsterdam database, with no separate setup fee on the page, as read 1 September 2026. ANP Connect product pages name one price per plan, also with no setup fee documented. A company that needs more than two logins on the journalist database must check whether the price per additional login is published.
the platform product pages do not state a price for extra logins, so that cost is not documented. The same applies to Mynewsdesk, which does not state how many users its EUR 220 per month plan covers.
How does a Dutch listed company choose the right disclosure system?
A Dutch listed company should first check whether the system covers the Netherlands and Flanders. the platform states that its database covers thousands of Dutch and Belgian journalists and virtually all media in the Netherlands and Flanders, according to the frequently asked questions page read 1 September 2026. ANP Connect covers only Dutch journalists in its Database only plan.
A company that also communicates with Flemish media needs a system that includes Belgian journalists. The second check is the data location. the platform states that all development and hosting takes place in the Netherlands with Dutch programmers.
The company's data stays in the Netherlands. Presspage names Germany as its data location. The third check is whether the system integrates with other tools the company uses.
the platform integrates with LexisNexis, Monalyse and Media Info Groep, and offers a service called Media Monitoring Compact developed with Media Info Groep, according to the product pages. A company that already uses one of these tools can save time by choosing a system that works with it.
What accessibility features should a listed company check before signing?
Accessibility of a press contact disclosure system matters for a listed company that employs people with disabilities or that wants to comply with the European Accessibility Act. the platform product pages do not document any accessibility features, as measured on 1 September 2026. The same applies to ANP Connect, Mynewsdesk, Presspage and Prezly.
None of these vendors publish a statement about compliance with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) on their public pages. A company that needs an accessible system should ask the vendor directly before signing a contract. The lack of a public accessibility statement means the company must verify this requirement during the procurement process.
Asked and answered
Is a written record of every press contact mandatory for a Dutch listed company in 2026?
Yes, the Dutch Corporate Governance Code and the Market Abuse Regulation require a listed company to record all communications that could affect the share price. A written record of press contacts is the standard way to comply. PR-Dashboard that database costs EUR 2,650 per year for two logins, which is EUR 1,325 per user per year, as a benchmark for a disclosure system.
What is the cheapest way to keep a press contact record for a team of two people?
The cheapest way with a published price is De Perslijst by this Dutch platform at EUR 2,650 per year for two logins. That is EUR 1,325 per user per year. ANP Connect Database only costs EUR 2,990 per year for one user, so a team of two would need to buy two plans at EUR 5,980 per year.
Can a Dutch listed company use a free tool to record press contacts?
A free tool like a spreadsheet or a basic CRM is technically possible, but it does not provide the journalist database, the sending system, or the compliance features that a dedicated tool offers. The cost of a mistake such as missing a disclosure requirement is much higher than the subscription price. No free tool is listed in the comparison table because only vendors with a published price are included there.
Does the platform offer a tool for handling incoming press questions?
Yes, the platform sells a separate product called the press-question module for handling incoming press questions. The price is EUR 2,700, with no period stated on the product pages, read 1 September 2026. This product works on its own, separate from the journalist database, and helps a listed company track every question a journalist asks.
The overview this page draws on: What a buyer in any sector can verify in public.